Which statement reflects a less-cautious view of AI's impact on white-collar workers?

Which statement reflects a less-cautious view of AI's impact on white-collar workers?

• A. The economy will soon be fully automated
• B. Automation could happen in a couple of years or less.
• C. AI will not impact white-collar jobs
• D. There will be no significant job displacement

Answer: (B)

Understanding how soon AI might affect white‑collar work is the main idea here. The statement automation could happen in a couple of years or less signals a rapid, but not absolute, expectation of change. It treats the timeline as short and plausible without claiming that every job will be abolished or that the entire economy will be fully automated. That combination—possibility of swift impact with room for nuance—makes it a less-cautious view than hedging with no impact or displacement, and less sweeping than claiming near-total or complete automation. So it best captures a stance that change could come quickly for many roles while leaving space for ongoing complexity and variation across industries.

Understanding how soon AI might affect white‑collar work is the main idea here. The statement automation could happen in a couple of years or less signals a rapid, but not absolute, expectation of change. It treats the timeline as short and plausible without claiming that every job will be abolished or that the entire economy will be fully automated. That combination—possibility of swift impact with room for nuance—makes it a less-cautious view than hedging with no impact or displacement, and less sweeping than claiming near-total or complete automation. So it best captures a stance that change could come quickly for many roles while leaving space for ongoing complexity and variation across industries.